However, there are enough people out there who do not get debunked to keep the question an open one.

I personally have met two people who I completely believe have some kind of clairsentience. Considering I have personally come into contact with many so called "psychics", that is a very low percentage. However, it only takes one to prove that it exists.

In addition to my own experiences, my g-grandfather was tested at Johns Hopkins University and passed all of their tests. He had several experiences that made him somewhat famous during his lifetime, but he never charged a penny for his gift.

One of my nieces has exhibited some very strong gifts as well.

Just my two cents.

In a few other forums, I posted this .... based on some some specific Psi (Psychic) Claims that some people sought me out to test. (Like the Traffic Light Person.)

Now understand, I do not seek people out to test, they seek me out.

This gal sought me out because she felt she was " Clairsentience " She asked me to test her, because she felt I would first be fair and second that I would be honest. She failed all the tests ... even the ones I allowed her to set up in the end.

Then some people got me for being a NON-Believer and that I set the tests up for her to fail. She showed me that she had character and integrity when she defended my testing of her. (Not many have done that!) It silenced the 'hate posts'.

Then I made the two following statements:

There is a big difference between debunking a personal claim of psychic (Psi) ability and the possibility of a psi-power existance. It just has been shown that it does not exist in that specific person(s).

But then I also asked -

At what point if everyone with a specific Psi claim is debunked that we have to honestly question the actual existance of said Psi Ability?

Comments?