They should of left the cattle mutilation investigation alone. I assume the conclusion regarding the bloating of the carcass causing the skin to tear was for this specific case only but they just ignored the other factors and seemed to think they had the case solved. Anyone who has read about cattle mutilations knows of the cases where things just don't add up to it being natural predators causing these attacks. The lack of blood, the missing organs, the precision cuts, the mysterious helicopters, the strange lights, and the limited duration of the events. The show is worth watching but often seems somewhat hurried through but I am not going to post some rhetoric about how I have all the answers like some of the posters on SyFy do. /tongue.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':P' />

I loved him in Zombieland /smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />

J/K /laugh.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> Sounds like a good one though /cool.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />

I thought that said Bill Murray, too! /laugh.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />

I thought holly hell they landed, the Bill.

"**** my eyes".

Just started watching, Fact or Faked, I like Bill on the show, Andy's right he carries it.

Looking forward to the interview, and having it on podcast.

I have been enjoying the episodes as well.

And, don't forget! Bill Murphy will be on the radio with us this Thursday on ZTalkRadio.com.

Thanks Andy for helping to set that up!

Bill will be on from about 6 p.m.-6:50 p.m. Pacific. Please join us in the chat room and ask him some questions. /smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />

I loved him in Zombieland /smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />

J/K /laugh.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> Sounds like a good one though /cool.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />

And, don't forget! Bill Murphy will be on the radio with us this Thursday on ZTalkRadio.com.

Thanks Andy for helping to set that up!

Bill will be on from about 6 p.m.-6:50 p.m. Pacific. Please join us in the chat room and ask him some questions. /smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':P' />

Andy

Last night's episode was really enjoyable. I really liked the Paulding light segment. Wish I could afford that road trip, lol...

.

I agree Andy. The Paulding light segment was interesting. They thought for sure they had that one debunked, especially Jael. She seemed a little cocky on the last episode about the El Cajon triangular light video. The apparatus they floated with balloons was pretty close to looking like it but it does not necessarily mean that what it was. The section about the "ghost" kids pushing the car over the railroad tracks was a waste. A lot of people knew that was caused by an optical illusion. I even said that before the even began the segment. I like the show in general, with stories like the Beast of Exmoor and the Paulding Light they got my attention.

I really enjoyed tonight's episode of fact or faked. That creature reminds me of something a friend of mine and I once saw driving the backroads near Muskogee. What we saw sort of materialized, and seemed vaporous, but it's general locomotive characteristics and build was similar. I found that segment to be very interesting. Thermal hits were cool as well.

I know I have mentioned this before, but the goofy effects do take away from the show. The addition of the rainbow "histogram" over the thermal footage to make it look more techy and official was just ridiculous. It is the same way that DT overdubs the sound of tube charging to it's thermal video, or the way they overdub the crackle of a geiger counter when using standard emf meters (that have no such audio ability like the k2 on Extreme Paranormal). I know why they do it, it is just annoying and I think takes away from the experience from those watchers that know a bit about the equipment. The average public probably won't notice and would think I am nitpicky. I usually am, lol.

Andy

Andy

.

I liked this one better also. The film from Fresno was indeed interesting. I have no idea what it could be. Seems if it was faked they would've used a being similar to what others have seen but those two were just so bizarre its add to the credibility.

With the number of UFO clips in the thousands, I assume they chose one they knew was likely staged so they could debunk something to add credence to their agenda. Overall it was a fairly interesting episode. One of the few shows I will watch on a regular basis.

I know I have mentioned this before, but the goofy effects do take away from the show. The addition of the rainbow "histogram" over the thermal footage to make it look more techy and official was just ridiculous. It is the same way that DT overdubs the sound of tube charging to it's thermal video, or the way they overdub the crackle of a geiger counter when using standard emf meters (that have no such audio ability like the k2 on Extreme Paranormal). I know why they do it, it is just annoying and I think takes away from the experience from those watchers that know a bit about the equipment. The average public probably won't notice and would think I am nitpicky. I usually am, lol.

Andy

Andy

Anyone else catch this? Episode one was about the infamous YouTube sensation that most on here I am sure have seen the so called "ghost car" and part 2 was about the Arizona lights. They spent 30 mins on recreating and analyzing the video of the chase and spoke to the officer. They ended up assuming the car went through the fence because it was not secure along the bottom. They spent too much time on this part and not enough on the Arizona lights.

It was only footage from one camera at one location. I was confused on whether this was separate from the "Phoenix Lights" which was witnessed by thousands and has tons of footage and witnesses galore. Overall I give it a C based on too much time on the "ghost car" and not enough on the "Arizona Lights". I like the premise of the show but was disappointed in the first episode.

I'm almost positive I've seen the show you're describing or one very similar. I remember both of these examinations.

I've only heard of them referred to as the Phoenix Lights. My guess is they are the same.

It was only footage from one camera at one location. I was confused on whether this was separate from the "Phoenix Lights" which was witnessed by thousands and has tons of footage and witnesses galore. Overall I give it a C based on too much time on the "ghost car" and not enough on the "Arizona Lights". I like the premise of the show but was disappointed in the first episode.

That had crossed my mind. They have enough stuff with their spin. If they screw up this I will just give up on SYFY as ever being a trustworthy network for any information.

Did they mention anywhere to go to leave any real feedback? I doubt the decision makers really take the SYFY forum seriously. JMO

Yup, if Syfy messes with the show's concept, then I agree (with exception of DT). I would hate to see syfy go the way of A&E.

Andy

Time will tell...but I can see SYFY putting their spin on it and lean towards the "entertainment" aspect not the educational that American Paranormal was....

That had crossed my mind. They have enough stuff with their spin. If they screw up this I will just give up on SYFY as ever being a trustworthy network for any information.

Did they mention anywhere to go to leave any real feedback? I doubt the decision makers really take the SYFY forum seriously. JMO