<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Paranormal Underground - Topic: Throwing illumination at certain ccd&#39;s is just a waste</title>
	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Explore the Unexplained]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.2</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>Humming on Throwing illumination at certain ccd&#39;s is just a waste</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4051/#p81007</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Gadgets</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4051/#p81007</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>what a difference, your pictures really show it. Good info. thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:52:01 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Tom_BGH on Throwing illumination at certain ccd&#39;s is just a waste</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4044/#p80873</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Gadgets</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4044/#p80873</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.  While I&#39;m not really into CCTV setups, this is pretty tempting - at least to get me thinking about it.  Price-wise, that is hard to beat.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:36:03 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>ourobouros2k2 on Throwing illumination at certain ccd&#39;s is just a waste</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4044/#p80863</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Gadgets</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4044/#p80863</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>...so these are for a cctv?  what is the distance illumination like?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
	Thw wolfcom is a cctv type camera, and it&#39;s spec&#39;d distance rating is 150&#39;, but 100 would be more of a real world figure. It also depends on your target, location, etc. but they are very impressive...</p>
<p>	The sony was the dcr-sr65 handycam hybrid camcorder. I knew it was weak in nightshot, but despite throwing more and more illumination at it, it is still pretty dim. Not unusable, but as you see, not admirable either. </p>
<p>	Sony beats it at resolution, but I need dark performance.</p>
<p>	regards,</p>
<p>	Andy</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 02:47:55 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Tom_BGH on Throwing illumination at certain ccd&#39;s is just a waste</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4044/#p80862</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Gadgets</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4044/#p80862</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>...so these are for a cctv?  what is the distance illumination like?</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 02:19:54 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>ourobouros2k2 on Throwing illumination at certain ccd&#39;s is just a waste</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4042/#p80836</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Gadgets</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4042/#p80836</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Panasonic has the technology, it just isn&#39;t available in anything but their more expensive prosumer offerings. 1k and above.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:05:17 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>RyanNREMTP on Throwing illumination at certain ccd&#39;s is just a waste</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4042/#p80828</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Gadgets</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4042/#p80828</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s a shame since Sony is still the leader in camcorders for ghost hunting.  I&#39;m really surprised someone else like JVC or Panasonic hasn&#39;t taken up the slack.  Guess we are a very small minority when it comes to customers.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:53:57 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Boatlesspirate on Throwing illumination at certain ccd&#39;s is just a waste</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4042/#p80824</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Gadgets</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/page-4042/#p80824</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow-what a shame. Thanks for the post Andy. I guess my SR-11&#39;s value just went up&#33;&#33;</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:42:59 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>ourobouros2k2 on Throwing illumination at certain ccd&#39;s is just a waste</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/#p80822</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Gadgets</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-gadgets/throwing-illumination-at-certain-ccds-is-just-a-waste/#p80822</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Recent topics in another forum about late model hybrid Sony&#39;s performance while in niteshot mode prompted me to do a quick test to see the difference for myself. I should mention that there is an insane amount of ir illumination here, all 850nm (approx. 30 led&#39;s in the ring, and the onboard led on the sony). There is a typo on the picture as the size of the ccd on the Wolfcom 912 is 1/3&#34; not 1/4&#34; 9as stated in pic). Results pretty much speak for themselves, and as far as late model sony cameras go, it isn&#39;t a matter of how much illumination really, it just isn&#39;t overly sensitive to IR.</p>
<p>	<a href="javascript:void(null)" class="vtip" title="Click image to enlarge" onclick="spjPopupImage('http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f53/ourobouros2k2/ccdcomparison.jpg', '362', '561', '1');" ><img src="http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f53/ourobouros2k2/ccdcomparison.jpg" width="100"  class="sfimageleft" alt="" /><img src="http://www.paranormalunderground.net/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-themes/css-only-paranormal/images/sp_Mouse.png" class="sfimageleft sfmouseleft" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>	Regards..</p>
<p>	Andy</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:32:14 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>