<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Paranormal Underground - Topic: Hi Def/Low Def investigation</title>
	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-experiments/hi-deflow-def-investigation/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Explore the Unexplained]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.2</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-experiments/hi-deflow-def-investigation/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>RyanNREMTP on Hi Def/Low Def investigation</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-experiments/hi-deflow-def-investigation/page-528/#p10559</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Experiments</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-experiments/hi-deflow-def-investigation/page-528/#p10559</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t have any hi-def equipment  but what you are saying makes a lot of sense.  I noticed a big difference from our first investigation to the second when I switched the film quality of the camcorder from regular to high quality.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:54:40 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>NoWhammies on Hi Def/Low Def investigation</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-experiments/hi-deflow-def-investigation/#p10251</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Experiments</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-experiments/hi-deflow-def-investigation/#p10251</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Well  - we certainly had a little experience with the difference between Hi-Def and low-def investigation. To the investigators out there - if you can swing a Hi-def recorder like the H4 (which we are offering as a prize in our fiction contest, by the way&#33;), run it side-by-side with your regular digital audio recorder. The results are interesting. The one realllly interesting audio clip we have is on both hi and low-def - but strangely, it is less audible (but still clearly there) on the hi-def, even tho the two recorders were side by side.  <img class="sfimageleft" />/blink.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> </p>
<p>	We had the same experience with cameras. The DLSR clearly ruled out some of the odd things we found on a little digital Elf type camera that was probably five megapixels or so.</p>
<p>	I would guess that if we ran video side-by-side (instead of only using the hi-def), it would be something similar.</p>
<p>	My theory at this point: The lower the definition, the easier it is to misidentify something - whether a sound or an image. What do you guys think? Has anyone tried hi-def/low-def side-by-side? Do you think this is a valid experiment to continue on with?</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:25:54 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>