<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Paranormal Underground - Topic: SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</title>
	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Explore the Unexplained]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>Dr. Obvious on SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p104951</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Debate</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p104951</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Being skeptical of skepticism...........</p>
<p>I may, or may not, believe --- need more data.........</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:20:29 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>MysticalKnight on SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p104940</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Debate</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p104940</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Nightwatcher said </strong></p>
<p>In my online research of altenative medicine and alternative medical methods, I found this "skeptic" forum web site.<br />
<a href="http://www.skepticforum.com/index.php" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.skepticforum.com/index.php</a></p>
<p>In the paranormal section, there are 703 topics and over 22,000 comments. That's a lot of reading. I glanced over some of the topics and comments and decided to put the forum website into my favorites for later reading when time permits. I wanted to share the forum web site with the PUG members and readers.<br />
<a href="http://www.skepticforum.com/viewforum.php?f=7" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="http://www.skepticforum.com/vi" rel="nofollow">http://www.skepticforum.com/vi</a>.....um.php?f=7</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for the info!</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:23:52 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Nightwatcher on SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p104939</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Debate</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p104939</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>In my online research of altenative medicine and alternative medical methods, I found this "skeptic" forum web site.<br />
<a href="http://www.skepticforum.com/index.php" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.skepticforum.com/index.php</a></p>
<p>In the paranormal section, there are 703 topics and over 22,000 comments. That's a lot of reading. I glanced over some of the topics and comments and decided to put the forum website into my favorites for later reading when time permits. I wanted to share the forum web site with the PUG members and readers.<br />
<a href="http://www.skepticforum.com/viewforum.php?f=7" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="http://www.skepticforum.com/vi" rel="nofollow">http://www.skepticforum.com/vi</a>.....um.php?f=7</a></p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:45:26 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>ourobouros2k2 on SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p16750</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Debate</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p16750</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I especially love the artcles and arguments against Randi. I went to one of his lectures, and in the company of other skeptics, he is downright smarmy. Thanks for this link&#33;</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:12:44 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>MysticalKnight on SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p16712</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Debate</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p16712</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#33;</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:15:19 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>NoWhammies on SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p16706</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Debate</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p16706</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/" target="_blank">http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/</a></p>
<p>	SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</p>
<p>	I love them.  I mean.. I really love them. My heroes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
	Lots of good information there&#33; Thanks for the link.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:36:49 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title> on SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</title>
        	<link>http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p16695</link>
        	<category>Paranormal Debate</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.paranormalunderground.net/forum/paranormal-debate/scepcop-scientific-committee-to-evaluate-pseudo-skeptical-criticism-of-the-paranormal/#p16695</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/" target="_blank">http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/</a></p>
<p>	SCEPCOP - Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal</p>
<p>	I love them.  I mean.. I really love them. My heroes.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:01:50 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>