ST, I don't want to discourage you and I'm not criticizing your evidence. Just prepare yourself for a lot of skepticism. But don't feel bad: To the best of my knowledge there has never been ANY evidence captured that satisfied all the skeptics. There is always an alternate explanation.

It's just so hard to prove that the wind or a draft wasn't moving the door. You may be absolutely certain that there wasn't any draft or wind, but how would you prove it unless you had a camera filming a wind gauge? But how would you prove that the wind gauge was filmed at the exact place and time the door moved? See what I mean? It's a dilemma.

The door could have been pulled by strings attached to the wood or handle, or it could be manipulated by someone on the floor or out of camera view. . . The list goes on and on. I am NOT accusing you of doing any of these things. I'm just pointing out that it could have been done. There are just so many ways to hoax that it makes it hard for anyone to accept other people's evidence.

Personally, I believe the only way to get skeptic-proof footage would be in a laboratory. I can't think of any other way that anyone could possibly have enough camera angles, etc to satisfy a skeptic. It would require a totally controlled environment where every single square inch of the test space was being filmed.

IMHO, evidence is exactly like personal experiences. No one who was not there to share the experience will ever REALLY believe that it is real. But that's just my personal opinion.

I dont get mad and upset over time i know there is many factors involved and i know it will be chewed up and spit. i believe i was in the right place at the right time for it to open. juist to let people see what got me addicted. and it adds to my story cause all these occurences i talk in my story. my wife says i am gullible. thanks st

Is the house OPEN for investigation? It was rather – well … "to on command" … The way the window opened it honestly did look mechanical … as in Electronic ….

When I've seen "paranormal" that were not electronic – remote control … they were not 'smooth' .. they were investgated and verified NO remote control and/or electronics attached to the object … right on command and such … The 'spirit' – 'ghost' or 'paranormal' were .. well "they" had to work to make it happen. It was not 'smooth' and such.

Remove the probable, the logical, the reasonable first and foremost.

Here is an example of what I am talking about – "On Command" and the "Quick Response" … The guy was honest about it being 'set up'…..

As he said in a Forum Dialog – We never see UNDER the table and there is good reason. We never see the table top too close and again for good reason. His friend is off camera with an R.C.

I'm just reading your story now st, thanks for posting your footage to go along with my reading. I can only read a little at a time but it is very interesting. Do remember that when you put up your evidence you may get lots of debunking, it goes with the territory so don't be offended. I like that I can see what you are talking about in your story. Thanks for sharing.

this was house for training fireman. it was locked. this was my first time going to the home.

Simple investigation – ask the fire department permission to go inside.

Show them the video as the why … and … let them be apart of the answer. They very easily will have an answer for you.

Actually I can see even more so this being remote controlled. But hey, I could be wrong.