Paranormal Forum - Paranormal Underground

July 29, 2009
3:38 am PDT

DoverDemon

Member

Forum Posts: 203

Member Since:
July 15, 2009

Offline

1

Just wondering what some of your opinions are on this "new" footage of what appears to be a continuation of the original footage? I have my doubts on the validity and can elaborate but would like to see what others think. /unsure.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />

"They insisted that the victim animals simply had died of dog bites from dogs or other animals. They suggested that disease might have been responsible for one animal's death. They denied that the victims had been exsanguinated, as many witnesses had claimed, and even suggested that the puncture wounds reported might be from barbed wire. Callers reminded them that some wounds were deep enough to reach into the victims' lungs, that the flesh was not torn as in dog bites, that signs of struggles were inexplicably missing, and that corpses did not decay normally, but their arguments were brushed aside. Also brushed aside were callers' attempts to bring extraterrestrials into the conversation.

When the recording ended. I rewound it and played it again and again. I still could not believe what I was hearing. The callers had the skeptics pinned against the ropes from the very first call." - Scott Corrales

July 29, 2009
3:52 am PDT

pooperdooper

Member

Forum Posts: 2049

Member Since:
December 29, 2012

Offline

12261

Just wondering what some of your opinions are on this "new" footage of what appears to be a continuation of the original footage? I have my doubts on the validity and can elaborate but would like to see what others think. /unsure.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />

DDemon if I may ask? What is the Gable footage? That way I can look up the old footage as well.

July 29, 2009
3:56 am PDT

DoverDemon

Member

Forum Posts: 203

Member Since:
July 15, 2009

Offline

12263

DDemon if I may ask? What is the Gable footage? That way I can look up the old footage as well.

.

P D – search YouTube or Google, you will see, interesting film to say the least.

"They insisted that the victim animals simply had died of dog bites from dogs or other animals. They suggested that disease might have been responsible for one animal's death. They denied that the victims had been exsanguinated, as many witnesses had claimed, and even suggested that the puncture wounds reported might be from barbed wire. Callers reminded them that some wounds were deep enough to reach into the victims' lungs, that the flesh was not torn as in dog bites, that signs of struggles were inexplicably missing, and that corpses did not decay normally, but their arguments were brushed aside. Also brushed aside were callers' attempts to bring extraterrestrials into the conversation.

When the recording ended. I rewound it and played it again and again. I still could not believe what I was hearing. The callers had the skeptics pinned against the ropes from the very first call." - Scott Corrales

July 29, 2009
4:00 am PDT

pooperdooper

Member

Forum Posts: 2049

Member Since:
December 29, 2012

Offline

12265

.

P D – search YouTube or Google, you will see, interesting film to say the least.

I'm on it like a duck on a June Bug!

July 29, 2009
4:51 am PDT

pooperdooper

Member

Forum Posts: 2049

Member Since:
December 29, 2012

Offline

12277

DDemon,

Could only watch a segmented pixilated version of the film so far.

Work computer constraints don't allow UTUBE access. I will have a run at it

in the morning from home though. What I saw in the beginning appeared to move

similiar to a great ape but then took on a bears lumber when it passed the tree.

I can't wait to see the clear original version of this.

July 30, 2009
6:14 am PDT

Zaxxon

Member

Forum Posts: 166

Member Since:
July 18, 2009

Offline

12409

I thought that the guy that originally published this said that he thinks that its a hoax because at one point you can see a human leg. But I will say that it makes me uneasy just thinking about an animal that big that can move that fast. The teeth when I think he turns back around is a nice touch. The time stamp down to the second without a date does make me wonder though.

July 30, 2009
6:28 am PDT

pooperdooper

Member

Forum Posts: 2049

Member Since:
December 29, 2012

Offline

12413

I thought that the guy that originally published this said that he thinks that its a hoax because at one point you can see a human leg. But I will say that it makes me uneasy just thinking about an animal that big that can move that fast. The teeth when I think he turns back around is a nice touch. The time stamp down to the second without a date does make me wonder though.

Bears can and do move that fast. I'll get a look at the whole film sooner or later!

I thought I read where the maker of the film has already said that the film was

never intended to be construed as real life? He is even enforcing his copyright on it

according to one site I read the posts on.

July 31, 2009
5:13 am PDT

Zaxxon

Member

Forum Posts: 166

Member Since:
July 18, 2009

Offline

12588

Bears can and do move that fast. I'll get a look at the whole film sooner or later!

I thought I read where the maker of the film has already said that the film was

never intended to be construed as real life? He is even enforcing his copyright on it

according to one site I read the posts on.

I think it was a "I don't know if its real or not" deal, which might have been true.

I've never seen a bear have all fours off the ground running fast like that, but then again we don't have many bears where I'm from either.

July 31, 2009
5:23 am PDT

HeidiAnn67

Member

Forum Posts: 15116

Member Since:
June 14, 2009

Offline

12589

I think it was a "I don't know if its real or not" deal, which might have been true.

I've never seen a bear have all fours off the ground running fast like that, but then again we don't have many bears where I'm from either.

how does a bear run if all fours are off the ground?

wouldnt that be flying? /laugh.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' Laugh ' /> j/k sorry i couldnt' stop myself haha

July 31, 2009
3:39 pm PDT

DoverDemon

Member

Forum Posts: 203

Member Since:
July 15, 2009

Offline

12599

Bears can and do move that fast. I'll get a look at the whole film sooner or later!

I thought I read where the maker of the film has already said that the film was

never intended to be construed as real life? He is even enforcing his copyright on it

according to one site I read the posts on.

.

My understanding is that the original Gable film was found in the bottom of a box of some items someone bought at some type of private sale. The person who made it has not come forward to claim they shot the footage. It has been slowed down, enhanced, and analyzed to death. I am not sure what it is. Bears do exist in the area of Michigan where it was apparently filmed but they are not that common and wild bears would normally run away and would not likely be that aggressive unless guarding their young. The shoulders look way too massive to be any type of dog. I'm am not sold on it being some type of werewolf or dogman, I'm not talking about any human changing to an animal by any means, but some type of upright sometimes bipedal anomaly.

The second film supposed takes up where the first one ends, for those who have not seen it. It depicts police finding a half eaten human body that was supposedly mauled by a bear and does appear from the same era on similar type of 8mm film. I have made some observations that lead me to believe it is a hoax that I could elaborate more if I could look at the film thoroughly again. I read where someone checked records and there is not any reports of anyone being killed by a bear anywhere near this area of Michigan during the late 60's early 70's much less someone with the last name Gable.

"They insisted that the victim animals simply had died of dog bites from dogs or other animals. They suggested that disease might have been responsible for one animal's death. They denied that the victims had been exsanguinated, as many witnesses had claimed, and even suggested that the puncture wounds reported might be from barbed wire. Callers reminded them that some wounds were deep enough to reach into the victims' lungs, that the flesh was not torn as in dog bites, that signs of struggles were inexplicably missing, and that corpses did not decay normally, but their arguments were brushed aside. Also brushed aside were callers' attempts to bring extraterrestrials into the conversation.

When the recording ended. I rewound it and played it again and again. I still could not believe what I was hearing. The callers had the skeptics pinned against the ropes from the very first call." - Scott Corrales

July 31, 2009
3:55 pm PDT

NoWhammies

Moderator

Forum Posts: 3983

Member Since:
December 29, 2012

Offline

12605

Huh. All I see is a bear. But it is really difficult to tell because the footage that I can find is of poor quality.

July 31, 2009
8:33 pm PDT

RyanNREMTP

Moderator

Forum Posts: 7427

Member Since:
December 29, 2012

Offline

12646

The way it takes off running resembles a gorilla more than a bear with the long massive forearms.

Here's an animation of a gorilla running.

Here's a picture of a gorilla's teeth which to me resembles the teeth that flash for a brief second on the Gable film.

July 31, 2009
9:18 pm PDT

pooperdooper

Member

Forum Posts: 2049

Member Since:
December 29, 2012

Offline

12659

The way it takes off running resembles a gorilla more than a bear with the long massive forearms.

Here's an animation of a gorilla running.

Here's a picture of a gorilla's teeth which to me resembles the teeth that flash for a brief second on the Gable film.

Running into that bad boy in the woods of anywhere would forever change the huntlust

in any wanna be Bwanna.

August 1, 2009
2:10 am PDT

Zaxxon

Member

Forum Posts: 166

Member Since:
July 18, 2009

Offline

12797

The way it takes off running resembles a gorilla more than a bear with the long massive forearms.

Here's an animation of a gorilla running.

Here's a picture of a gorilla's teeth which to me resembles the teeth that flash for a brief second on the Gable film.

Don't Gorillas lurch forward as they run? I'm not sure that it was a Gorilla. Not that I think it is real. I figure that if it were real, then that film would have been known about at some point, because whomever found the body, probably called the cops and then they probably took it into evidence. And why doesn't the film keep running until the film runs out? Why out in the middle of the woods, does the timestamp start from zero when the person spots the creature? Take the time to load new film and risk missing it?

August 1, 2009
2:30 am PDT

sympathyforthedevil

Member

Forum Posts: 1912

Member Since:
April 23, 2009

Offline

12813

The way it takes off running resembles a gorilla more than a bear with the long massive forearms.

Here's an animation of a gorilla running.

Here's a picture of a gorilla's teeth which to me resembles the teeth that flash for a brief second on the Gable film.

Ryan, from what I could see, thought it was a gorilla, also.

The gait or tracking is not of a bear, from what I could see.

But, the footage is very fuzzy. What do I know.