Paranormal Underground

Explore the Unexplained

twitterfacebookyoutubeyoutuberss

Reality Bites: One New Hampshire Couple’s Experience on Ghost Hunters

by Karen Frazier, Managing Editor
Paranormal Underground Magazine

Leigh and Renee Macneil were excited. After an investigation of their 1856 home by New Hampshire Paranormal, they were contacted first by New Hampshire Paranormal and then by Patrick Powell of Pilgrim Productions asking if they would allow their homes to be featured on an episode of the wildly popular SyFy network show, Ghost Hunters.

According to Leigh Macneil, he was excited that their home’s history would be shown, and he was looking forward to having others see some of the strange goings on that he and his wife, Renee – a high school teacher – have experienced during their time in the house.

After sharing the house’s history and some of their experiences there with Powell, the Macneils were off and running. On the first day of the shoot, the entire TAPS and Ghost Hunters production team arrived at the appointed hour. According to Macneil, everyone from TAPS was really nice, and their experience with Jason Hawes, Grant Wilson and the rest of the team was great.

The Macneils did a walk through of the house and a recounting of many of their weird experiences, and then they were off to the nice Pilgrim provided hotel for the night. TAPS and the production crew investigated and filmed into the wee hours of the morning.

On day two of filming, the crew returned without the cast to shoot what is commonly known in “the biz” as B roll. They retraced the steps of the house tour in order to capture footage that would be interspersed throughout the portion of the episode featuring the Macneil’s home.

Day three of filming involved background interviews seeking out the history of the house – including interviews with the local historical society.

On day four, Hawes and Wilson returned with their crew for the “reveal”. During the reveal, Macneil was disappointed with the findings of the investigation, but felt reassured when Hawes and Wilson assured him that hauntings don’t happen on cue and that the house could be an ongoing investigation. The producer from Pilgrim was also reassuring, telling the Macneils that the house looked great and would present really well in the episode.

All in all, the Macneils really enjoyed their experience with TAPS and Ghost Hunters. Until the show aired.

Unfortunately for the Macneils, their case was featured as a “debunking episode.” Those familiar with the formula of Ghost Hunters are aware that, in the midst of the cases where hauntings can’t be disproven, Pilgrim Productions likes to throw in a good old fashioned debunk now and again just to maintain the show’s credibility.

The Macneil home findings, according to Ghost Hunters? A radio that has turned itself on is debunked as having an alarm set to go off every night at 3 a.m. According to Macneil, this surely can’t be the solution. For starters, the radio has only ever turned on twice – and always in conjunction with an immediate rise in volume followed by the CD tray popping open. It doesn’t happen nightly, and it isn’t just the radio going off as portrayed in the show. The volume increase and the CD tray are always part of the equation.

“We can read an instruction manual,” Macneil said in a phone interview yesterday. “If it was set to go off every night at 2 a.m., it would go off every night. It doesn’t. It’s gone off twice and never at 2 a.m.”

Other debunks set forth on the show include earthquakes and the instability of a rug. The conclusion that one is left with at the end of the episode? There’s nothing unnatural or paranormal going on at the Macneil house.

According to Macneil, they shared a number of incidents that have occurred in the house with both TAPS and the show’s producers that weren’t even mentioned in the final cut of the episode. There have been a number of odd incidents that just can’t be explained away with pat answers like earthquakes and alarm clocks.

Macneil gave me one such example involving Christmas lights. As Macneil tells the story, he was alone in the house one night, making pizza in the kitchen. The flour from the pizza made him sneeze, and he was certain that he heard something that sounded like, “bless you,” from the middle of the house, followed by footsteps. Macneil followed the sound and wound up upstairs, where the Christmas lights that had been hanging securely in six windows from three different rooms all season were mysteriously on the floor.

When it came time for their show to air (Episode 5.5 – Judgment Day), the Macneils told all of their family and friends to watch. Macneil was looking forward to seeing the house’s history on television, and maybe receiving some validation of the things that they’d been experiencing. Instead what he saw made him feel duped, and he felt it made his wife, Renee, look paranoid. All of the unexplained events, all of the history of their home was distilled into a 15 minute debunk that, according to Macneil, “I could have come up with myself.”

Throughout our conversation, Macneil reiterated that TAPS and the crew were all extremely courteous and very nice. One gets the impression that he doesn’t have an ax to grind with Wilson, Hawes et al, but he’s none too happy with the editing done by Pilgrim Productions.

His reaction is understandable. In their time in the house, the Macneils have experienced a number of strange events like the Christmas light story he related to me. The Macneils were hoping to have their story told in a way that shared their experience of the house, rather than in a manner that met an editor’s “debunking quota.” Both were embarrassed and felt that they were made to look like fools on an extremely popular national television show. I’m sure many others in their shoes would feel the same way.

After reading about the Macneil’s experience and talking with Leigh, I contacted Jason Hawes to find out his take on the Macneil investigation, as well as how much input he and Grant Wilson actually had into the editing of the show.

According to Hawes, “We have investigated over 100 locations so far just on the show, and I have only heard three people who have been upset with us after.”

Hawes went on to list the three investigations where they’ve gotten negative feedback. One involved a homeowner who stated that she didn’t want her house shown on television and it was (most likely Brenda from an early episode of Ghost Hunters, who has been quite vocal on the Internet with this criticism and a few others), one that involved a personal issue with one of the team members, and the Macneils.

Hawes accepts responsibility for the issue of the house being shown on television in that early episode saying, “… was not TAPS, but was still wrong and she should hold us all responsible.”

About unhappy clients, Hawes had this to say, “… it would seem certain people are not willing to accept the answers we may give them. If someone calls us into their home and has us investigate they need to be able to accept a yes or no. Bottom line is that LA can only use what they (The Client) gives them to use on camera.”

As for the editing of the show?

According to Hawes, “We at TAPS have no say over that.”

He went on to explain, “We have say on our cases, where we go and so forth, Production can not touch our evidence, they can not tell us who is on our team or who is removed.”

And are they happy with the editing?

“Sure sometimes we are not happy with editing. There have been cases like that.”

About the MacNeil investigation in particular, this is what he had to say:

“The family in New Hampshire are great people and I very much enjoyed speaking with them and investigating their home. We did not catch anything, these things don’t happen on cue. Cases take time. That was brought up at the table. We told them it could be years before we caught anything. If LA showed that then great, if they did not then at least (they) know it was said.”

This is, for the record, exactly what Leigh Macneil told me that TAPS said to them in the reveal. That the investigation would need to be ongoing.

Hawes went on to talk about the criticism that evidence obtain by New Hampshire Paranormal that was not featured on the show, saying, “We can not use other team’s who investigated their homes evidence for the main reason, we have no idea what was going on, no idea who was there, and no idea on possible contamination. How can I take another team’s evidence and claim it is legit when I have no idea where, how, when and so forth they caught it?”

In the end, it seems that the Macneil episode was unfortunate for both TAPS and the Macneils; however, on one thing both parties agree. They enjoyed working together.

Comments (18)
  1. Karen Frazier / Reply September 22, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    A comment from Renee Macneil that I received via email:

    “I would say, however, that we are not people who need to be on the list of unsatisfied “customers”. We were very pleased with what Jason and Grant told us and our overall experience with them and the crew (which, I believe you communicated very well) and it was only the chopping of the show that aired that we felt unsatisfied by. I just wanted to reiterate that we are not mad, just hoping people will realize that what they see isn’t always the whole truth.”

  2. Rick / Reply September 22, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    I like TAPS I think they are the only and I mean only, legite paranormal investigation team on TV.

  3. MysticalKnight / Reply September 22, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    Thanks for the balanced reporting Karen! It’s great hearing both sides of a story.

  4. sandstone / Reply September 22, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    TV is TV. I feel sorry for the family, but hopefully most people will understand that reality shows have very little to do with reality. Nice article, Karen!

    BTW, Rick, your sarcastic comment is pretty funny! I always enjoy humor!
    ;-)

  5. William / Reply September 23, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    First you start with this:

    “Leigh and Renee Macneil were excited. After an investigation of their 1856 home by New Hampshire Paranormal, they were contacted first by New Hampshire Paranormal and then by Patrick Powell of Pilgrim Productions asking if they would allow their homes to be featured on an episode of the wildly popular SyFy network show, Ghost Hunters.”

    Then after contacting Mr. Hawes,

    “About unhappy clients, Hawes had this to say, “… it would seem certain people are not willing to accept the answers we may give them. If someone calls us into their home and has us investigate they need to be able to accept a yes or no. Bottom line is that LA can only use what they (The Client) gives them to use on camera.”

    But people don’t call them, they are contacted by Pilgrim as stated in the first paragraph, so it seems there’s a contradiction there.

    Along with this:

    He went on to explain, “We have say on our cases, where we go and so forth, Production can not touch our evidence, they can not tell us who is on our team or who is removed.”

    But yet, production found their case, set up their location. As to the statement that “Production can not touch our evidence”, does that mean they admit to doctoring the Manson Episode FLIR footage? Hawes denies this on the Sy Fy forum after the doctored video was discovered, and admitted it was doctored and promised to get to the bottom of the issue. The results of the issue were never produced as to whether production doctored the video or TAPS, as he states production has no way to touch their evidence in this interview, hmn…

    Also, next time you talk to them, why don’t you ask if they are Licensed Roto-Rooter plumbers?

    The Manson episode controversy, I believe, can still be found on the Sy Fy forum, if not, check out the Manson video thread on

    http://www.skepticalviewer.com/doctored-manson-flir/

    As well as the famous color tug in the 2008 Halloween special? Do a search on youtube of “Grant fake collar pull” Very interesting stuff. Or on the site above. I am not affiliated with the site, I only found it when I became suspicious of certain things.

  6. Karen Frazier / Reply September 23, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    This is a single story piece, not meant to do anything other than discuss the one story – the Macneil’s experience on Ghost Hunters and Jason Hawes’s response to that. I realize that others are drawing conclusions based upon Mr. Hawes’s comments to me; however, he was commenting on two questions that I asked:

    Can you provide comment about the Macneil’s experience on Ghost Hunters?

    ~and~

    Can you tell me the extent to which you have participation in the editing of the show Ghost Hunters?

    Those are the questions I asked, and I relayed the answers that I received. This was meant to present both sides of that story – nothing more or less.

  7. BornAware / Reply September 23, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    Awesome blog. It’s not very often we get to hear both sides of any story, and for once, I feel like I did in this case. Good work.

  8. William / Reply September 24, 2009 at 1:39 am

    I will let others draw their own conclusions, I just wanted to point out inconsistancies in Mr. Hawes statements. He is the one who stated that “people call them into their homes” When we know from the story that is not true, it goes to his credibility as does the “production has no say on where we go, etc.” when production found Mr & Mrs MacNeil through NH paranormal.
    Even worse is the statement that production has nothing to do with their evidence when there is the Manson Doctored FLIR which has been proven and admitted by Mr. Hawes. The referral is made only to reflect on the STORY and HIS REPLIES, that production has nothing to do with their evidence and that clients call them. If there is evidence out there that his statements are false, one even shown in this story and the other backed up by factual statements and findings, only serves to propagate falsehoods and not serve the public.
    If you truly want your readers to know about the paranormal, don’t you want them to know what is true and what isn’t? Just a question…that’s all I have to say about this.

  9. Karina Kay / Reply September 24, 2009 at 8:01 am

    I agree with you, William. Hawes very directly states that “Production can not touch our evidence” and he does NOT add “on this particular episode.” It is a black and white fact that the FLIR footage was doctored and Jason blamed the production team for that one. Now, I’m sure the fanboys will say that Jason simply spoke in error, or they will find some other excuse, but it is also a fact that Jason is a PRODUCER and, therefore, a member of the production team.
    I don’t believe PUG is about finding the truth. It’s about making everyone feel welcome – believer, skeptic, or in between.

  10. Karen Frazier / Reply September 24, 2009 at 8:40 am

    Actually – what PUG is about is presenting information from a neutral standpoint. I am a journalist – not a pundit. I know it is sort of an oddity in this day and age – neutral journalism, but it is what we strive for here. We present what we have learned, and we allow our readers to draw their own conclusions. It sounds like you are all doing that quite well.

    I have opinions – lots of them. But I don’t see it as my job to share the conclusions that I may have reached without all of the facts present. I don’t have all of the facts about TAPS or Ghost Hunters. I’ve had a few very limited exchanges with Jason Hawes about some very specific topics.

    I am well aware of the Manson film footage issue. I am well aware of other issues surrounding paranormal television as a whole. They have been well-covered by other sites like DarkRealm labs. PUG came into being after that whole controversy – and so covering it seemed to be coming a bit late to the party.

    I have my own belief system. But I am not here to present “my” slant on topics, nor am I here to support a single point of view. I’m here to present the stories. Period. I feel it is unethical for me to present myself as a journalist and then take something that is a fact-based piece and start presenting my own suppositions. That then takes the focus of the story away from the “just the facts ma’am” approach and puts it smack onto me. My stories aren’t about me. My blog is different – but I still am more about asking questions than providing answers – mostly because I don’t have any.

    The bottom line is that no one knows “the truth” about the Manson footage. What we know about Hawes and Wilson’s involvement in the editing of the show is only the information that the two of them have put out there, including in Mr. Hawes’s comments to me in this article.

    If I came across new information and indisputable facts, I would report them. And I would ask for commentary from every side of the issue. I believe that is my role. To present the information from a neutral standpoint, regardless of what my personal belief system is.

  11. TheJybian / Reply September 24, 2009 at 8:56 am

    I highly doubt that PUG has the budget to go following TAPS around seeking “the truth”. Free sites tend to operate under such restrictions. Which is precisely why it the story was presented as told, with no conclusions drawn. Perhaps those of you with agendas should take up a stalking fund and go after Pilgrim directly. Please let us know if you find anything.

  12. Cheryl Knight / Reply September 24, 2009 at 10:13 am

    Oh gosh, I certainly hope everyone feels welcome at PUG. If everyone feels they can have their say here at Paranormal Underground in a respectful way, then we are definitely achieving one of our primary goals: allow the believer, researcher, skeptic, nonbeliever, etc., to voice their opinions in an open forum.

    Everyone (underscore everyone) is welcome to voice their opinions here without personal attacks, trolling, etc. From Rick’s statement above to William’s statement, etc., we allow everyone to have their say. Without all viewpoints, this field will not progress, because one person’s truth is not the next person’s truth. No one person gets to decide “the truth.”

    As cocreator of Paranormal Underground, one of my main goals is to take a balanced approach to our reporting, and if we make statements based on personal opinion or experience, we say so. We say, this has been our experience … not, this is the truth because we think it’s the truth.

    That being said, if anyone feels that they can’t have their say here, I certainly hope they let us know, because if people feel they can’t voice their opinion in a respectful way, then we have lost what we are about.

  13. sandstone / Reply September 24, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    It is great that you do allow some freedom of expression in the comments posted here. I’ve noticed that the thread on SyFy that had covered this topic has now been deleted. That’s too bad, it was a good discussion up to where I had been reading it. It is unfortunate that SyFy doesn’t allow all that much freedom within forum discussions. That’s why I don’t post there all that often.

  14. MysterySkeptic / Reply September 25, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Karen,
    Have you spoken with the MacNeils since they been banned and their topic removed from syfy forums?

  15. Karen Frazier / Reply September 25, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    Oh my gosh – they were banned? I knew the thread went *poof* but I had no idea they had been banned. I was out of town yesterday….

    I have a phone call scheduled with Renee Macneil on Monday afternoon. I haven’t talked with either in a few days.

  16. JD Harrison / Reply September 29, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    Karen,
    Great reporting! Your blog on this matter is balanced and represents BOTH sides of the story well. You presented the facts (just the facts ma’am) in an unbiased manner, and in my humble opinion, THAT is what PUG is about. Great work!

  17. Michelle Pillow / Reply October 4, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    I’m just going to echo JD’s comment. Great reporting, Karen. :)

  18. Edward / Reply November 17, 2010 at 7:20 pm

    This episode reminded me of the one where a young couple lived in what I think was a church or some residence that had a bell tower and they clearly weren’t haunted and desperately wanted to be. I see the same situation here, they wanted to be haunted and weren’t so they have to “explain” themselves. Early on TAPS seemed to be hounded with families that had small children being attacked by unknown beings and it became obvious very quickly that they were being used by people willing to lie about the kids to get on TV. Too many peole wanting that 15 minutes of fame and willing to make up things to convince TAPS to waste their time in their home.




Leave a Comment

Shopping Cart
  • No products in the cart.
12-Month Digital Subscription Only $19.99!
Get 12 digital issues of Paranormal Underground magazine. We’ll e-mail each new issue to you every month. Subscribe now and save 15%!
Subscribe Now for Updates
Video Gallery
Close Box

First Time back?
You must reset your password
to log in to the new site.

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Please enter your username or email address.
You will receive a link to reset the password via email.