Predetermined Bias? It Goes Both Ways.
by Karen Frazier, Managing Editor
Paranormal Underground
It goes both ways. What you ask? Predetermined bias.
One of the arguments I hear from debunkers and hard-core skeptics is that paranormal investigators enter a scene with a predetermined bias towards paranormal findings.
You know what? They are right. There are a number of investigators who do just that. There are just as many who don’t. They enter every single location with a skeptical eye and an open mind.
It seems that you could say the same thing about hard-core skeptics. Looking at evidence from a paranormal scene, they are looking with a predetermined bias as well. Only their bias resonates with them, so they don’t recognize it as such. Wanting and expecting to disprove the paranormal is just as much of a bias as wanting and expecting to prove it.
It goes both ways. What you ask? Dogmatic religion and dogmatic science.
One of the arguments I hear from hardcore scientist types is that religion is full of dogma. It is. But then, so is science. Sometimes science even seems more heavily dogmatic than religion.
Why is scientific dogma good and religious dogma bad – or vice versa? Thinking that current science is infallible and has all of the answers is just as short sighted as believing that all of the answers can be found in religion. After all, at one time, the science of the day said that the world was flat because anyone who sailed too far didn’t come back
What is it I am trying to say? If everyone spends so much time ego-invested and convinced of their own inherent rightness, then we’ll never get anywhere. We’ll be too busy judging one another and dismissing everyone else’s ideas to ever be able to fully recognize the good ones when they come along.
Perhaps discovery is best served from a place without ego. A wonderful and utopian world where everyone approaches everything with an open mind and a wait and see attitude. You may say I’m a dreamer. But I’m not the only one.
Just imagine where we could go if we opened our minds.
I agree. Just as there are investigators who go in biased, there are also “skeptics” who go in the same way, such as James Randi (who is a non-believer, not a skeptic).
The big difference I see between religious dogma, paranormal dogma, and scientific dogma is that scientific dogma is based in facts, whereas the other two are based in faith. To dismiss scientific dogma on the premise that science is fallible seems of centered to me. While science is fallible it has a far superior track record to the other two, which cannot backup anything with any sort of facts.
The ego things is something that has been going on for a very long time, which seems to be one of the biggest problems with making progress in the field of paranormal investigation. Take for instance the para-celebs who proclaim themselves experts in the paranormal realm. They, just as the celebs of the “skeptics”, proclaim they know what is going on when the truth is neither knows anything. The para-celebs proclaim just about every anomaly as proof, while the “skeptics” claim it as something else. Truth of the matter is the evidence that is out there is so poorly collected that nothing can be determined.
I have yet to see either side have an open mind on the issue. Investigators claim they are open minded because they are willing to accept the possibilities that the paranormal may produce. But when debating the issue, I’ve found most are open to science because they lack knowledge about science. “Skeptics” will claim they are open minded and will look at the evidence, but many are simply non-believers and will dismiss anything. Personally, I look at the evidence and see if it entails any facts to it. So far, I haven’t found anything that would prove it was violating the laws of physics, which is the definition of paranormal. I’ve seen a lot of weird anomlalies, hoaxes, poor interpretaion, camera straps, bugs, dust, pseudoscience, etc. Which doesn’t mean the paranormal doesn’t exist or hasn’t been captured, but it does show that paranormal investigators haven’t made their case.
Good points, Dream. All of them. Oh – and thank you – non-believers. That is the term that I couldn’t for the life of me come up with.
I certainly wouldn’t dismiss science merely because it has been proven incorrect – or should we say “updated” as new information became available. I just worry that it can become dogmatic, as well. Obviously, I’m not a huge fan of dogma no matter what form it takes.
Frankly, I don’t know how open-minded I truly am. It is hard to see our own preconceived biases. I am aware that I have biases, and as such I try very hard to not have them play a role in what I am doing. But we are most blind to ourselves. I doubt I’m the exception to this rule.
Thanks. Always appreciate hearing your take on things.
Great blog Karen. I just keep learning more and more here. I had a discussion with another member last night that was along the very lines of this blog. The coversation gave me a new insight on how and why we continue to search for answers in the paranormal.
The coolest thing about science is its ablility to reverse position, to say “I was wrong about that.” In fact, publication in peer-reviewed periodicals asks the question “How am I wrong here?”
There aren’t many disciplines that alllow for this, require it in fact.
Hey Harrison, get my back here.
I would agree that peer-review is a great tool that has helped further science and many great discoveries.
I am not a scientist and the business world I am in doesn’t allow for peer review. My outlook is skewed in favor
of the underdog in the field of the paranormal. Constructive criticism can often be confused as very negative
by the frustrated. Every person in this field would enjoy seeing a definitive starting place to base an investigation
that would be recognized by the whole scientific community. However for that to happen failure and trial and error will
have to be accepted until a breakthrough or definitive proof that we are chasing our tails comes along. Thanks for a
new perspective on all this.
Shopping Cart
Our Latest Magazine
12-Month Digital Subscription Only $19.99!
12-Month Digital Subscription to Paranormal Underground Magazine (12 Digital Issues at More Than 15% Off the Cover Price!)
$19.99 Add to cartSubscribe Now for Updates
Video Gallery