I Know What I Saw
by Karen Frazier, Managing Editor
Paranormal Underground Magazine
I have a skeptical mind. I am always suspect of my own experiences and impressions – especially with regard to the paranormal. In the moment what I experience seems so solid and real, but in the aftermath I always come in and skeptically question myself.
There’s a reason for this. I am all too aware that I want to believe, and I wonder if that desire fuels the experiences I have and turns them into something else entirely. I wonder if my imagination runs wild because I have such a desire to experience and know that there is an afterlife. Because I am so aware of this desire, it colors all of the aspects of my experience. I always question them. Could this be true? Could I have imagined this? Did I see what I wanted to see, feel what I wanted to feel and hear what I wanted to hear?
After each round of questioning, I wind up even more confused than I started out. After all, experiences of the paranormal are often ephemeral. There is such subtlety there. Very seldom is it something solid and unmistakable. Even more rarely is it provable. I’ve had my fair share of such experiences, and I’ve talked myself out of a number of them. Those experiences still wind up in the realm of the unexplained for me, but added into all of the other things that might be an explanation I add imagination run wild.
Which brings me to my experience with the full-body apparition at Wellington on Saturday night. Naturally there’s been a lot of debriefing. I’ve discussed the experience with a number of people -both immediately after the fact and in the days following. And each person has had their own set of questions associated with the experience. All which have led me to think deeply about this experience in ways other than just how I would normally question myself.
I see this as a good thing. Because, in spite of all of my concerns that I have about wanting to find evidence so badly that I just might imagine it, answering everyone’s questions has solidified the experience for me in a way that it might not had I merely been answering my own questions.
In the end, for me it comes down to a simple statement. I know what I saw.
As one who always questions everyone else after an experience – not out of skepticism, but just out of a desire to really know and understand their experience – I have heard enough people eventually after answering all of my questions say to me, “I know what I saw.”
I found myself saying it in this case. Now I get it. When it is there before your very eyes, how can you deny it? For me, at least, seeing is believing.
As I questioned myself – and answered the questions of others – there were a few things that actually solidified the experience for me. First and foremost – I saw the figure in a moment when I was expecting nothing and wasn’t really looking for anything. There were a lot of people in that snow shed. One group of about 10 people was 50 yards behind us. Another group of about the same size was a good 200 yards ahead of us. When the snow shed has that many people, one doesn’t expect to have many experiences – if any. Another thing that convinces me is the utter lack of emotion. I was in an area where I normally get very creeped out, and I was feeling nothing. Not even a twinge of the heaviness or hostility that I normally feel in that very location. Every other experience I’ve had in that area – whether it is hearing something, feeling something or actually being touched – has been accompanied by such a heavy, hostile feeling that one can’t help but wonder if imagination is coming into play. This time there was none of that. Instead, it was just Bill and me – walking and talking after having laughed with two different groups of people.
I know that I won’t be able to convince many of what I saw. Heck – there have been plenty of times when I have trouble convincing myself. I am my own worst critic in that way. What it comes down to for me this time is that I know what I saw. It was a man. He was solid. He had height, width, depth and density. He stood in the middle of the snow shed, quietly waiting for me to notice him. When I did, he disappeared. In this moment, at this time, that is good enough for me.
Enjoy reading Karen’s blog? Her new book, Avalanche of Spirits: The Ghosts of Wellington> is now available. Click here to buy.
This reminds me of my first experience as a kid. I remember it vividly to this day. But since I was only about 5 years old at the time, I hardly considered it an experience. I take most reports by children with a grain of salt. Yes, they could be real but a child’s imagination is a powerful thing. So to me it’s hard to count it as much. Still with what I saw and thinking back, it could have been my imagination. That was until I was talking to one of my sisters and she had the same experience at the same house. We never told each other about our encounter, but here was a family member who saw the same thing. It leaves me wondering if what I saw was really a ghost now.
This is something that I have long been looking at, and was actually part of a discussion I was having with a fellow investigator this weekend. Even when we’re sure of what we saw is it really what was there? Human perception is a creation of the brain doing its job, but what happens when it glitches, or misinterprets the information it is flooded with?
One of the things we looked at was how many of these glitches people experience but never relate to anything. Many times we’ve noticed where a person thought they saw something but dismissed it because they then witnessed what caused them to perceive the event. Now when this happens in an everyday setting and nobody has the thought of ghosts on their mind they simply write it off as a trick of the mind. But, put them in a “haunted” location and they jump to the conclusion that it’s paranormal.
I witnessed that very thing when conducting an experiment on the effects of psychological contamination, in which the group who was fed a false story experienced bits and pieces of that story. All those who claimed to have seen something emphatically swore they saw what their claims were, even though the source of what they had seen was explainable and had nothing to do with the paranormal. Even after the investigation was exposed as a ruse they still claimed they knew what they saw, only to find themselves embarrassed when the video tape clearly showed they were wrong.
Heck, I’ve even witnessed something I was sure was there, and that something was witnessed by someone else from a different location. But when we checked it out there was no evidence that it had happened. In fact, the evidence pointed to the contrary. So what did we see? Why did we both see the same basic thing? Did we really see it or did we both get fooled by our brains? About the only thing I know for sure is that we both experienced something. Other than that the whole incident is a mystery that can be interpreted several ways: Paranormal, trick of the mind, or some sort of hoax. Since the later is very improbable, the other two are the only realistic possibilities. So which was it? In all probability it was probably a trick of the mind, but how to know for sure is impossible to determine. This is the main issue with personal experiences. Even if we could download what we perceive we can not trust the information because if the mind glitches there is know way to know.
I agree – we have so many filters in place that it is hard to ever know objectively what an experience is. Ever. This is right along the lines of what I have already been thinking about with human perception.
Shopping Cart
Our Latest Magazine
12-Month Digital Subscription Only $19.99!
12-Month Digital Subscription to Paranormal Underground Magazine (12 Digital Issues at More Than 15% Off the Cover Price!)
$19.99 Add to cartSubscribe Now for Updates
Video Gallery