Paranormal Underground

Explore the Unexplained

twitterfacebookyoutubeyoutuberss

I Don’t Like Orbs but…

by Karen Frazier, Managing Editor
Paranormal Underground Magazine

“I don’t like orbs, but I think I’ve really got something here.” I’ve heard the words. I’ve uttered the words. Even the big guys fall into the orb trap – seeing some piece of evidence that seems significant and then having it dismissed because there are orbs present.

I get it. Dust in a flash shows up as an orb. Bugs do. Reflections do. Good lord – I bet on one of my PMS fat days, I’d show up as an orb in a photograph.

Because there are a ton of logical explanations for orbs, does that mean that there is no such thing as an orb that is evidence of the paranormal? I dunno. Sometimes I wonder.

Cheryl and I were interviewing Zak Bagans, Nick Groff and Aaron Goodwin from Ghost Adventures yesterday (watch for their interview and podcast in October!). At one point, orbs came up in the conversation – in particular balls of light that were filmed going into both Bagans’ and Groff’s heads prior to what each of them experienced as a “partial possession.”

In the interview, Bagans was quick to point out, “They weren’t bugs. They weren’t dust. We know what those things are, and that is not what those were.”

Another person I interviewed, artist Jody Bergsma, showed me picture after picture of her, surrounded by orbs. The picture taken immediately before with no Bergsma in the shot? No orbs. Put her in the picture and BAM – thousands of orbs all around her. It is an interesting (and repeatable) anomaly, to say the least.

My first orb photo EVER was taken at a haunted location. While I am relatively certain that it was the reflection of the flash off of a reflective surface in a darkened room, it was an interesting coincidence.

My very first orb photo ever - captured at Puyallup Washington's Meeker Mansion. Most likely a reflection of the flash.

My very first orb photo ever - captured at Puyallup Washington's Meeker Mansion. Most likely a reflection of the flash.

My friend, Michael Hunt, captured an orb on camera up at Wellington – taken in the daylight with no flash. It looks like a little 3-D pearl, with a tinier 3-D pearl hovering above it. Interestingly, the same big orb/little orb pairing was captured in a few other flashless photos.

Captured at Wellington - no flash used. Bug? Dust? Something else? Notice that if you look really closely, there is a smaller, almost identical orb above and to the left of the obvious one.

Captured at Wellington - no flash used. Bug? Dust? Something else? Notice that if you look really closely, there is a smaller, almost identical orb above and to the left of the obvious one.

This photo - also taken without a flash shows the same interesting big orb/little orb pairing as the previous image.

This photo - also taken without a flash shows the same interesting big orb/little orb pairing as the previous image.

It’s true. Orbs have become the red-headed step-child of the paranormal world. There’s a reason for this. There are just too many logical explanations for what could cause the orb. But what if….what if in some cases what they are is exactly what people believe them to be? Evidence of the paranormal. That what if makes it difficult to dismiss the appearance of orbs out of hand.

If you spend enough time chasing the paranormal, at some point you are going to come face-to-face with an orb. Most often, you will be able to dismiss it. But occasionally, you won’t, and you’ll find yourself joining in with the leagues of those before you who have said, “I don’t like orbs, but….”

What of that? What of Bergsma’s magnetic (orbnetic??) personality? What of the Ghost Adventures Crew’s experiences with these little balls of something? What of your own experiences?

I’m not saying that orbs are paranormal. I’m asking what if? I’ll tell you this. I don’t like orbs, but sometimes I wonder.

Since my first orb capture, I’ve gotten a few more. In closing I will leave you with the best orb photograph I personally have ever taken.

The best orb photograph I've ever taken.

The best orb photograph I've ever taken.

Spooky, huh?

Comments (3)
  1. GhostBreakers / Reply September 9, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    This debate is decades old. The orbs caught on camera could be anything but most are what people think. Dust, moisture, etc. One person says they are paranormal and the other say they are not. Maybe it is time we approach the orb phenomena from a different angle.
    Should we be asking ourselves, do the photos have any significance at all? If you think they do, then what? If you photographed an orb, what do you really have? Do you have proof of the paranormal? Can you prove anything at all about your orb photo? What significance does your photo really have?

    To me not one orb photo has any evidentiary value and doesn’t even amount to a hill of beans regardless of what it is or is perceived to be. I think orbs are a phenomena that someone a long time ago capitalized on because there is no way to prove what they were. Someone said they are paranormal and then ran with it.

    So the next time someone says they caught an orb on camera. Maybe we should ask them what it actually is and how they know for sure? Sort of like the people that say they cleanse a place and send the spirit on. On to where? How do they know where they sent them? How do they double check it? How do they know they didn’t send kindly old Aunt Tilly to an eternity of Hell? Not what is it but how do you know what it is?

    It all just boils down to a matter of opinion and nothing more at this time. People will believe what they want and I am afraid it may always be this way.

  2. Karen Frazier / Reply September 9, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    Yep – it’s an old debate, that’s for sure. It just struck me how many people I’ve heard utter the words, “I don’t like orbs, but….” If I had a nickel…

    You’re right. The problem is that we don’t know for sure. But we could say that about every single piece of evidence. We don’t know for sure. Orbs are just easier to impeach than most.

  3. Dreamsinger / Reply September 12, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    And herein lies the problem with paranormal investigation. Assumptions. Orbs became popular because they were something that showed up in a picture, yet weren’t visible to the person(s) at the time the picture was taken. So, they automatically got the paranormal label. This can be seen throughout the paranormal community with all sorts of things. EVPs are another. “We didn’t hear anything when we recorded this EVP, therefore it must be paranormal.”

    This just goes to show that old saying about the word assume is still true and relevant. EVPs are just about as credible as orb photos, but are often highly regarded as proof of the paranormal, even though they share almost as many logical explanations.

    As long as investigators are quick to make assumptions that things are paranormal in nature, the truth will never be found.




Leave a Comment

Shopping Cart
  • No products in the cart.
12-Month Digital Subscription Only $19.99!
Get 12 digital issues of Paranormal Underground magazine. We’ll e-mail each new issue to you every month. Subscribe now and save 15%!
Subscribe Now for Updates
Video Gallery
Close Box

First Time back?
You must reset your password
to log in to the new site.

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Please enter your username or email address.
You will receive a link to reset the password via email.