Paranormal Underground

Explore the Unexplained

twitterfacebookyoutubeyoutuberss

Armchair Quarterbacks & Backseat Drivers

by Karen Frazier, Managing Editor
Paranormal Underground Magazine

There’s nothing I love more than an opinion. Some have even suggested that I am *gasp* opinionated myself. And what is that saying about opinions? Opinions are like ***holes. Everybody has them. No offense to the poor guy sitting over there who was born without one. An ***hole, that is. I’m pretty sure you still have opinions, and I’m guessing medical science found a way to bless you with the other.

Before I inadvertently start a worldwide movement (or is that a bad choice of word?) of mercy for that poor guy, let me get to my point which is, surprisingly, an opinion. Seems I was blessed with both.

I make my rounds on paranormal blogs, bulletin boards and other online paranormal communities. I don’t always post in them, but I do read. It’s the nature of my job as a paranormal journalist to keep my finger on the pulse of the paranormal community. Let me tell you this. There are times I can barely bring myself to read. After all, reading/hearing/seeing the same old same old grows wearisome. Surely you all can relate to that.

There are a lot of armchair quarterbacks out there who have some pretty strong opinions about what’s going on in the paranormal field. And they are more than welcome to have those opinions, truly they are. It’s a free country and we are free to voice our opinions provided we steer clear of things like defamation of character, slander and libel. Still, I have to wonder this. How many of those opinions are based on true experience in the field, and how many are based on just sitting around on one’s keister and talking about how stupid and pointless it all is?

Here’s a for instance. I recently read a post talking about how one of the cast on Destination Truth was a worthless wimp. I’ve watched Destination Truth. I’m pretty sure there are no wimps on that show. How do I know? Because I’ve never ridden river rapids, climbed sheer rock faces and walked/driven/hiked/flown thousands of miles in dubious conditions to chase down paranormal sightings. My guess is that the person who ventured such an opinion hasn’t either. And until they have done that, perhaps they might want to hold off on the entire wimp judgment.

Here’s another for instance. People gab all of the time about how ghosts aren’t real. It’s an opinion that they are entitled to and one I once shared. Still, I’m betting that many of those people have never, ever gone out in the field and attempted to find out for themselves. Because what I’ve discovered from the people who have spent an appreciable amount of time trying to find whether or not ghosts are real is that, somewhere along the way, they’ve had an experience that convinced them that they were. Not always, but in a lot of cases.

This is an entirely different thing than PROVING ghosts are real. I get it. For those of you who want proof, here’s what I have to say. Get out of your armchairs and find it. If you want to find a way for science to prove (or disprove) the existence of ghosts, then get out of the backseat and take the wheel. If you are already doing that, clearly I am not talking to you. You have my respect and admiration for following your truth and doing actual research to back up your statements. If you don’t believe in ghosts but don’t really make a point to go out of your way to taunt people who do, then I’m not talking about you, either. There are a lot of people who don’t believe in ghosts but don’t spend a lot of time opining on paranormal websites. But for the rest of you who have never made an attempt to investigate, try this: Start using scientific method to investigate places that people claim are haunted. Establish protocols that we can all use and learn from. Instead of being frustrated that the people investigating aren’t doing it right, lead the charge. Be the change that you want to see in the paranormal field. And if you aren’t willing to do that? Certainly you are still entitled to your opinion. But if you’re griping and not out doing, then really, how credible is that opinion?

I get it. It’s fun to point fingers and talk about what a tool the other guy is because he doesn’t do things the way you would. Especially the guy who’s out trying to discover and learn instead of sitting at home in the Barcalounger with a bag of Doritos and a beer. But Barcalounger guy, I’m talking to you. What are you waiting for? Clearly you have an interest in learning what it’s all about, or you wouldn’t be sitting at home watching/reading up on the paranormal (would you?). So why not put down the bag of Doritos, step away from the beer, rise up from the La-Z-Boy and get out there to create the change in the field that you claim you’d like to see? Maybe if you do, you’ll be the guy who changes the game forever. Can’t do that from a Barcalounger.

Enjoy reading Karen’s blog? Her new book, Avalanche of Spirits: The Ghosts of Wellington> is now available. Click here to buy.

Comments (2)
  1. Andy aka ourobouros2k2 / Reply March 28, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    Very good blog, resonates with much truth. A perfect example of this would be the regular attacks I and many others endure for our belief that there is an actual phenomenon behind the ghost box method of audio ITC (I suppose it could extend to all of ITC, but bashing ghost boxes is more popular). I love it! I was very skeptical of the device, but remained open-minded enough to give it a try. Had I not has some very interesting results, my use of the device would have died an early death. As it was, it told me my name and the name of the person’s room I was conducting the session in. Since then sessions have yielded cuss words, death threats, accurate answers to control questions (what am I holding in my left hand, what is my first and last name, what color shirt am I wearing, etc…) and many other interesting audio nuggets that I would classify as intelligent communication.

    I fully understand that until we know the mechanism at work here, it is an exercise in subjectivity. What amazes me is the never ending onslaught of internet experts who throw reheated arguments at me personally (such as pariedolia, apophenia, and matrixing) as if I had just crawled out of the primordial ooze yesterday. Remember folks, I started off trying to debunk it, so I am pretty familiar with those tenets of the human psyche. But that doesn’t do it, they continue to lob attacks and insults no doubt from their endless fount of personal experience in this matter. Armed with all the standard theories and comebacks, they do battle in the arena, fully missing the point that I never claim that this is an objective device for gathering evidence.

    The internet is full of armchair paranormal experts. They will laud devices like the k2 meter (in which they instantly lose any credibility with me) until their onscreen mentors and heros denounce it, then there will be countless blogs about how it sucks and isn’t fit for true paranormal research. These internet pearls of wisdom are passed along from folks most of which have never set foot on a haunted location with the intent of conducting an organized investigation or research. Their opinions on paranormal subjects ebb and flow with the popularity of the subjects with the accepted paracelebrity community.

    To close this out, personally, if a person wants to degrade my work or ideas, I suppose they better have some first hand experience. Reheating theories is one thing, but earning your stripes in the trenches is another. The latter of course will make me stand up in listen to your opinion, as I know it is borne of experience…the best teacher of all.

    regards
    Andy

  2. Dreamsinger / Reply March 30, 2010 at 4:38 pm

    I agree a lot with what you are saying here. But those that don’t believe believe cannot prove the non-existence of anything. All they can do is point to the fact that there is no credible evidence. This is a safe place to critique from, especially when they don’t offer advice or help with collecting credible evidence.

    The other-side of the coin is, you can lead most investigators to science and tell them how to do things credibly, or explain the issues with equipment or methods they use and they won’t take it. I’ve pointed out issues with EVPs, which is based on my professional knowledge, experience, and data that exists on RF contamination, yet investigators do no listen. In fact the groups that I’ve seen that once employed Faraday cages, stopped using them because they weren’t recording any “good” EVPs. That right there should have been a big clue to them. Instead of looking at their own data to, which indicated they were recording RF before, they instead abandoned it so they could get “better” EVPs.

    For critics, they won’t do much to try and help look for something they are sure does not exist. For investigators, I have yet to find a group that will listen to facts or take advice on how to scientifically investigate. Until that changes, there will never be any truth discovered about the paranormal.




Leave a Comment

Shopping Cart
12-Month Digital Subscription Only $19.99!
Get 12 digital issues of Paranormal Underground magazine. We’ll e-mail each new issue to you every month. Subscribe now and save 15%!
Subscribe Now for Updates
Video Gallery
Close Box

First Time back?
You must reset your password
to log in to the new site.

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Please enter your username or email address.
You will receive a link to reset the password via email.