Paranormal Underground

Explore the Unexplained

twitterfacebookyoutubeyoutuberss

Are You a Ghost Hunter or a Paranormal Investigator?

By Chad Wilson, Publisher
Paranormal Underground (www.paranormalunderground.net)

What makes a ghost hunter? The question was recently asked on our forums at www.ParanormalUnderground.net here in this thread. Ghost hunter, paranormal investigator, paranormal researcher, which is the correct term, or are they all correct? In my opinion, it boils down to why one particular person looks for signs of spiritual activity.

Here’s how this shakes out in my mind.

Ghost hunters: There are plenty of people out there who are looking for something new. They are akin to those who might travel the country riding the newest roller coasters at the various theme parks, or BASE jump from bridges . . . basically a thrill seeker. I think to some degree that is true of many who go in search of the paranormal, some more than others. To me, the thrill is part of the fun, but I am here for more than thrills.

This brings me to my next category, paranormal investigators, or more commonly those who seek spiritual counsel in order to glean the how’s and why’s of the spiritual world. They are the seekers of the truth as to what really happens after we die. I lump myself mainly into this category. But does calling myself a paranormal investigator mean I need formal training? I can see how it would help, but in my opinion all you truly need is a desire to know. As for investigating this field with tried and true methods, how can we when so little is known about the subject of spirits? I’m sure Karen has a blog in mind about this subject, so I will leave that to her. I will say this though, methods can be developed, but only after we understand what being paranormal is first.

Karen, bless her soul, font of wise words as she is, came up with the moniker paranormal researcher. To me that is slightly different than paranormal investigator in the fact that the researchers are the ones, such as Marcus Leader, Loyd Auerbach, and Bill Chappell, who try to find ways to help us communicate with, and define the spirit world. I also put a lot of the free thinkers out there who try and think outside the box when it comes to the other side in this category. They discuss, debate, and sometimes, together through the exchange of ideas, come up with new ways of approaching old problems. A recent example is battery drain, which we have discussed at length in our forums at PUG here.

To me there is room for all of these approaches to the field of the paranormal. I would even say a mixture would be the ideal. To me the sense of adventure that results from a desire to be thrilled by a ghostly encounter goes a long way toward keeping the interest level high. Spirits tend to not act on demand, which means usually you encounter nothing on investigations. But the thought that I could keeps me going.

Then there is the side of me who wants to know why the spirit world is the way it is. This is the driving force behind me becoming a paranormal investigator, the magazine, and any future involvement I will have in this field. This is why I do it, and I am sure it is also why a lot of others do it as well. Truth be told, the answers aren’t very forthcoming, but little by little I think the understanding of this field will become known. You can’t fault investigators for trying. The desire is there, I just think we need to understand the workings behind the paranormal more clearly before we can find definitive answers.

As for paranormal researchers, I’m not one to create devices. I do love to come up with new theories of my own about the elusive subject of ghosts and the afterlife. I do try and be open to all possibilities, and I try to foster that attitude on the forums at PUG and in our magazine. I feel that through true openness, the bouncing of ideas off of other enthusiasts can lead to new ways of thinking. As the saying goes, two heads are better than one. I think that holds true here as well.

That being said, I think all of us (the ghost hunters, the paranormal investigators, and the paranormal researchers) ultimately are in the same boat. I think it important that we put aside any differences and work together to further the field of paranormal investigation. Only in that way will we get true answers.

As a great man once said, “A house divided cannot stand.”


Comments (7)
  1. Karen Frazier / Reply August 8, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Great blog, Chad. I agree – a mix of all is a good balance. It’s how we learn.

  2. TheJybian / Reply August 8, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    Nobody has ever even proved that ghosts exist, and yet people want to put artificial distinctions on the field? Sounds a bit pretentious to me. Let’s be honest with ourselves, we’re all “chasing ghosts” to one degree or another. I think we can all agree it’s good to use a prescribed methodology when investigating, at least amongst your group, and it should be common sense to rule out other causes before labeling something paranormal. Aside from that, what makes any one group better of more professional than any other?

  3. MysticalKnight / Reply August 8, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    I can definitely see how a group just out to get kicks or make a quick buck might hurt the paranormal field, but I hope those groups are few and far between.

    I see the different categories of ghost hunter types as a “differentiator” of intention. I’m a Paranormal Researcher. I’d hate to be lumped in with those only out for a cheap thrill or to make a quick buck at the expense of others. Yes, there are probably these types of people in each group.

    But, I do believe that most investigators/ghost hunters/researchers in the field are looking for legitimate answers. At least I hope so.

    Great blog Chad!

  4. GhostBreakers / Reply August 9, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    As I read this I thought I would respond with my opinion also. Now, although I have never been one to tip toe around an issue, my intention is not to ruffle feathers but to just express my opinion and why. So, if I ruffle any feathers, first ask yourself “Why your feathers were ruffled?” then respond.

    In this field anyone can call themselves whatever they want to and they do. Do you need formal training to be a Paranormal Investigator? No, you do not. However, in most any other field you would, so why not this one? We should ask ourselves too, why would a person even want to call themselves an investigator if they have no training or don’t know how to investigate? Why do people call themselves investigators when in fact they are not. It’s like calling themselves a Parapsychologist and not having a degree in Psychology. Isn’t it? I mean,a nurse has the same basic desires but wouldn’t call themselves a doctor. Maybe I just don’t get it.

    Everyone, no matter what they are in this field has a desire or need to know but I don’t think that is all you need. That may be good enough for some but falls far short of the definition of an investigator or researcher. The reason for investigating is explained by answering the statement;
    (“ , how can we when so little is known about the subject of spirits? “)
    We will never know by just hunting. Only by adding investigating and then researching can we hope to find what we are looking for. Investigation is a science. A formal method for obtaining and recording facts and formal education in the field is a great asset and not hard to obtain. If all you do is take thousands of photos and recordings hoping for something to show up on them… I don’t see what that gives you.

    As far as the house divided quote. The people in this field are the ones who keep it divided. So many try so hard to look important that in doing so, they lose sight of the big picture. Their labels seem more important to them.

    I am not sure people will ever put aside their differences. People are always going to want to feel important and be taken seriously. In order for that, some will always feel that a label will do the trick.

    If it worked correctly, the Ghost Hunters would do what they do. Hunt, find clues, record them and report. Investigators would take that information and formally investigate the findings and classify it as evidence or not, etc. If it even can be classified as evidence for comparison and be added to their other cases. Then the researchers would take any corroborated findings from all the cases, items classified as evidence, etc., and then do what is necessary to research it. Meaning to first see if anything can be repeated under a controlled situation and so on. But a researcher knows how to research. Sorry.

    As far as gadgets. Anyone that’s been in this field any length of time knows they aren’t worth the effort and should be looking forward to something new. No offense to those who like gadgets. I am strictly speaking on a serious note of investigation and research.

    The problem these days is that most everyone is running around bumping into each other, doing the same repetitive things over and over, recording nothing for comparison. Expecting recognition for the garbled noise on their recorders and their orb & mist photos with nothing to back them up. Going to all the paid tourist attractions where thousands have gone before and calling that investigating.

    We all talk a good story but the truth remains that we are all individuals, with no set standard for gathering, recording or sharing anything. Oh, I know of a few groups that do among their own members but nothing as a whole community. If we can’t even do that how are we going to find the truth that everyone says they are looking for?

    Well, I guess we can just call ourselves whatever we want. However, when the time comes that someone does (or maybe someone already has) find actual evidence of something. Everyone will be asking questions as to how it was obtained and then I think what we call ourselves will be called into question and make a difference. Until then I guess everyone will do as they please.
    Sorry for the rant if it came off as that.

  5. Jon Kinstley / Reply August 9, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    First off let me say that I am a “ghost hunter”. I am also a retired Federal Agent. I do not charge or offer solutions to anyone for having let me investigate. The only places I have ever investigated have never been investigated before. GhostBreaker is correct in the belief that people find titles important and reassuring………in some instances.
    I am sure that every “ghost hunter’ or ” investigator ” and or “researcher” has at one time or another informed someone about what they were doing. By and large the paranormal field is still viewed with a skeptical eye in some places. I understand that it is now very popular in the Americas and in Europe. The fact that I am a “ghost hunter” allows me the luxury of explaining to people that it is my “interest” that makes me hunt for ghosts and no other reason.
    As for gadgets and gizmos, I’d have to say that by correlating as many anomolous events as you can while hunting, there assistance is invaluable when combined with common sense.
    I have had very limited contact with other people that investigate the paranormal. This is why I find this forum such a great place to listen to new ideas and reflect on ideas or beliefs that are contrary to my own. When and if irrefutable evidence of a haunting or any paranormal event occurs it will be because of the free exchange of ideas and knowledge that occurs on this and every other paranormal forum.

  6. Mr_Shadowman / Reply August 15, 2009 at 9:00 am

    I would classify myself as a “seeker” of the unknown. When the bridge to the other side is completed I feel that we will have a wealth of knowledge opened to us and many of our questions regarding the paranormal will have answers plain as day to us. Ghost hunting has become the latest fad for many, but the true seekers are low key investigators or researchers who work for the most part without notice. The EVP and ITC area is where I feel the last frontiers exist, and yes “ghosts” or spirits are part of that picture so I take them as normal. I devote my interests to astral projection, alternate realities, remote viewing, EVP’s and ITC’s. For me this is where I reside in thought, but I am also glad that I bump into a few “ghosts” or spirits along the way…..this way I have an endless supply of new friends that never cease to amaze me!.

  7. NWPIA / Reply August 21, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    When asked, we call ourselves ” ghost Hunters ” and the only reason why is most people can relate to what it is we do. Once I used paranormal investigator and was asked, “when was the last time you had seen Big Foot” ? “Or have you seen the UFO’s in Mexico”? It’s funny how peoples faces light up when you tell them you’re a Ghost Hunter, with big smiles on there faces they usually respond with ” That is so COOL, what channel are you guys on”?

    Bert




Leave a Comment

Shopping Cart
  • No products in the cart.
12-Month Digital Subscription Only $19.99!
Get 12 digital issues of Paranormal Underground magazine. We’ll e-mail each new issue to you every month. Subscribe now and save 15%!
Subscribe Now for Updates
Video Gallery
Close Box

First Time back?
You must reset your password
to log in to the new site.

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Please enter your username or email address.
You will receive a link to reset the password via email.